Adeleke Raheem Ajiboye, Ruzaini Abdullah-Arshah, Hongwu Qin, Jamila Abdul-Hadi


Artificial Neural Network (ANNs) is an efficient machine learning method that can be used to fits model from data for prediction purposes. It is capable of modelling the class prediction as a nonlinear combination of the inputs. However, a number of factors may affect the accuracy of the model created using this approach. The choice of network type and how the network is optimally configured plays important role in the performance of a predictive model created using neural network techniques. This paper compares the accuracy of two typical neural network techniques used for creating a predictive model. The techniques are feed-forward neural network and the generalized regression networks. The model created using both techniques are evaluated for correctness. The resulting outputs show that, the Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) consistently produces a more accurate result. Findings further show that, the fitting of the network predictive model using the technique of Feed-forward Neural Network (FNN) records error value of 1.086 higher than the generalized regression network.

KeywordsFeed-forward network, generalized regression,  machine learning, prediction

Full Text:



Adya, M., & Collopy, F. (1998). How effective are neural networks at forecasting and prediction? A review and evaluation. J. Forecasting, 17, 481-495.

Burns, J. A., & Whitesides, G. M. (1993). Feed-forward neural networks in chemistry: mathematical systems for classification and pattern recognition. Chemical Reviews, 93(8), 2583-2601.

Chattamvelli, R. (2009). Data Mining Methods. Oxford U.K.: Alpha Science.

Chtioui, Y., Panigrahi, S., & Francl, L. (1999). A generalized regression neural network and its application for leaf wetness prediction to forecast plant disease. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 48(1), 47-58.

Cigizoglu, H. K. (2005). Application of generalized regression neural networks to intermittent flow forecasting and estimation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10(4), 336-341.

Cigizoglu, H. K., & Alp, M. (2006). Generalized regression neural network in modelling river sediment yield. Advances in Engineering Software, 37(2), 63-68.

Hamed, M. M., Khalafallah, M. G., & Hassanien, E. A. (2004). Prediction of waste water treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19(10), 919-928.

Hancock, M. F. (2012). Practical Data Mining: CRC Press.

Haykin, S. (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines (Third ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kantardzic, M. (2011). DATA MINING: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms (2nd ed.): John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Kim, B., Kim, S., & Kim, K. (2003). Modelling of plasma etching using a generalized regression neural network. Vacuum, 71(4), 497-503.

Kutyłowska, M. (2014). Neural network approach for failure rate prediction. Engineering Failure Analysis.

Leung, M. T., Chen, A.-S., & Daouk, H. (2000). Forecasting exchange rates using general regression neural networks. Computers & Operations Research, 27(11), 1093-1110.

Mishra, A., & Desai, V. (2006). Drought forecasting using feed-forward recursive neural network. Ecological Modelling, 198(1), 127-138.

Negnevitsky, M. (2011). Artificial Intelligence A Guide to Intelligent Systems: Pearson Education Limited.

Pijanowski, B. C., Brown, D. G., Shellito, B. A., & Manik, G. A. (2002). Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: a land transformation model. Computers, environment and urban systems, 26(6), 553-575.

Taylor, B. J. (2006). Methods and Procedures for the Verification and Validation of Artificial Neural Networks. USA: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011). DATA MINING Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques: Morgan Kaufmann.

url for the data source: Retrieved Jan. 5, 2016, from


  • There are currently no refbacks.